Line Upon Line - JS-H 1:45-46, 49, 54

 

From the last post describing Moroni's visit to a repentant, 17 year-old Joseph Smith, we concentrated on how Smith's familiarity with scripture prepared him to received paradigm-shifting earthquakes as new contexts for prophecies became the content of an angelic message. We also noted how little of this content was relayed beyond Smith himself--as third party readers, we are told that the bulk of the message is not recorded here, just important summary details.

As a pedagogue who strives for excellence in teaching, what stuck out to me in the next verses was the mercy and didactic skill evident in Moroni's subsequent visits. With Joseph's mind still reeling from familiar passages given new light, the angel again penetrates the room and speaks: 

"He commenced, and again related the very same things which he had done at his first visit, without the least variation" (1:45)

There is a brief addition to the message this time, but then, after leaving Smith alone to ponder, yet again the messenger emerges from his luminous conduit, and, as Smith relates: 

"what was my surprise when again I beheld the same messenger at my bedside, and heard him rehearse or repeat over again to me the same things as before" (1:46)

After the repetition, without the least variation once more, we must assume, there was again an addition to the communication which built upon what was now already firmly anchored in the memory before the being of light once again departed.

Finally, as the night dissipated and the work day on the farm began without Joseph's ability to contribute much, the angel made one last appearance on that property, which is recorded for us with with the inclusion of: 

"He then again related unto me all that he had related to me the previous night" (1:49)

There's a double effect that this pedagogical method produces. First, repetition is the soul of teaching, and reinforces the message and details at each retelling. But it also structurally sets apart the non-repeated elements as even more memorable. In this case, the core was an exposition of scripture--of prior prophecy and pending fulfillment, all packaged in a new paradigm's arc, and the non-repeated additions align as follows: 1. a new prophecy of impending judgments (implying that Joseph's role would help mitigate them); 2. a warning to hold the plates sacred and avoid material temptation to profit therefrom; 3. a commandment to bring his father into the circle of trust about these visits.

I find these additions significant. They ground Smith in a few important ideas: 1. that God provides mantic manifestations and will continue to do so--He's not limited to speaking only through past prophets; 2. that God wants to prepare his servants against particular temptations and forces seeking to stymy the work; 3. that support in his functions and service as prophet will include not only heavenly sources, but earthly ones that know him best and care for him best--that family hearts were being prepared to accept the paradigm shifts that will come through him.

As we each receive callings to serve in the Church, this seems to me applicable as a pattern: 1. we need to seek His specific word on behalf of those within our influence, and expect that He will guide us; 2. He is interested in our success, which includes arming us with foreknowledge of our adversaries; 3. We have a circle of support He is concurrently priming to bear us up as we commit to serve.

On the fifth visit--the one at the hill Cumorah--we have the only one in this passage for which there is no mention of the actual arrival. We don't know at what point the angel appeared--whether it was before the unearthing of the box, during the course of removing earth, obtaining a lever, and peering under the stone, or at the moment of his first attempt to handle and remove the box's contents, as if in sudden warning. However we imagine the scene, what's clear is that the pedagogy was not complete--that the repetitions would continue, at regular intervals, for years. This would both allow Joseph to mature intellectually, spiritually, physically and socially, and would allow the message itself to have space for growth. 

Finally, a quick note on the reception of revelation. As Smith closes this part of his record, he deploys, for the first time, a suggestive term that hints toward a more mutual interaction than the previous verses. As he describes a prayer for forgiveness becoming an angelic visit, his narrative focus is appropriately on the messenger, the message and its reception. But the Cumorah visit and its subsequent annual visits--his fifth through ninth interactions with Moroni--seem described in a way that might have also applied to the previous 4: as "interviews". Joseph is allowed to question, to ask for clarification, to converse. His learning is active, not passive, and this also forms part of the model we should strive for as students of the Divine nature. Let us bring our curiosity, and allow our humility to show through active engagement with the voice of the Lord, whether it be through text (reading AND writing), through intermediaries, or through more direct representatives like the Holy Ghost. As He teaches us line upon line, precept upon precept, here a little, there a little, let us be agents, moving with our minds and our feet ever closer to the higher truths He wants to reveal to us.

It is the Same - D&C 1:38

"What I the Lord have spoken, I have spoken, and I excuse not myself; and though the heavens and the earth pass away, my word shall not pass away, but shall all be fulfilled, whether by mine own voice or by the voice of my servants, it is the same"

I referred recently to the lesson of Naaman, respected general of the Syrians who sought out the renowned prophet Elisha for healing when he was stricken with leprosy, and who was offended when Elisha himself didn't come to pronounce the remedy, but rather sent a servant to relay it. It's a great lesson on faith and humility--their interconnection, in fact. If God's interest is our growth in faith, then coming down personally to indelibly mark our consciousness with his blinding light and truth would produce obedience, but not choice. Just as Naaman learned about God's power better by listening to a servant, we come to rely on Him and learn of His character best line upon line, from small obedience to large obedience, from messenger to presence.

This is one of the grand keys to the question of why God chooses intermediaries at all, and especially why so many of them are our mortal peers rather than beings of obvious power and celestial provenance.

Another reason is the obverse: if Naaman hadn't hearkened to the servant, he would have remained leprous, but less culpable for his rejection of the true way to healing. If he had heard Elisha, in whom he already had trust as an oracle of God, and rejected the healing prescription because the Jordan was too simple a river, and bathing too ordinary a solution, his rejection would have come with increased condemnation. In other words, it's an act of mercy for the Supreme Justice to prevent the responsibility for rejecting higher and more obvious authorities until we've demonstrated compliance with the lesser ones and preparation for the higher knowledge and skills He promises. We are just according to the light we receive, and those who reject prophets are less responsible for the knowledge they've rejected than those who reject angelic visitations, or the sure knowledge of the Holy Ghost.

Yet even listening to fellow humans poses challenges. Hebrews who saw the 10 plagues, saw the waters part, saw the cloud by day and the fire by night, and saw the Lord provide miraculous food in the desert, still got worms when they over-picked the manna except on the Sabbath. And the most formally theologically educated group in Jesus's day took up hostile footing when the Son took flesh and began speaking of doing His Father's will. Speaking to these Pharisees, the Lord responded in John 5:23-24:

"He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him. Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life."

Later in His mortal ministry, the Redeemer trained the 70 to prepare the way for His preaching in cities that might not accept Him, he taught in Luke 10:16: 

"He that heareth you heareth me; and he that despiseth you despiseth me; and he that despiseth me despiseth him that sent me."

Our challenge is to accept truth from God, no matter what intermediary He chooses. It democratizes the ability to speak for God for Him to choose mortals like us as vehicles--a source of great hope to all who seek to know Him, since we can all accede to His spokesmanship in our own affairs and in the affairs pertaining to our callings. It encourages magnifying, and looking higher for us to see other mortals look heavenward for guidance, and trust their testimony as we seek and confirm our own. And it builds trust in the Lord to know that honoring His servants honors Him, because His servants point His way. They who need repentance call for it. They who insist on baptismal ordinances as signs of covenant-making themselves need the covenant belonging. And they testify of the Redeemer, and His father's kingdom.

Anyone who accepts Christ as Lord has to logically accept the principle of an intermediary. Anyone who accepts Christ as model must logically take Him at His word that the principle is extensible--others may represent Him just as He represents His Father.

And that nesting of intermediaries is what mercifully and didactically leads us higher.

As long as the source is true, that is.

What a bold, dangerous, and magnificent responsibility we have, then, to learn for ourselves who the servants of God are. If only there were a test...

Zero Tolerance - D&C 1:31

 

"I the Lord cannot look upon sin with the least degree of allowance"

 Schools and workplaces sometimes have explicit "zero tolerance" policies for certain kinds of misbehavior they find most egregious. In the academic setting, this most often refers to drugs or violence. The idea is that infractions in these areas aren't matters for explaining yourself to authorities who have discretion as to whether or not and to what degree to apply a penalty. Instead, they are a "you do the crime, you do the time" concept where the penalty is applied automatically no matter how light or "first time" your drug use was, or how justified or defensive your violence was. More broadly, the policies are designed to remove all doubt from all members of the affected community that there is no acceptable reason for the infraction. And they are also popular because the administrators don't need to engage in the messy business of moral judgment--they can just be blind to anyone's reasons, the context of the event, and the prevailing moral baseline of the community, and still come off as supporting high standards of behavior. It's using neutrality as cover for moral relativity.

As the moral law-giver Himself, the Lord doesn't fall into the category of moral relativist in the slightest. This verse casts Him as the embodiment of the opposite: moral absolutism.

But be careful to judge only as He does with respect to two implications: 1. Tolerance and allowance are different concepts; 2. Sins are not the same things as mistakes.

1. I know of now other Christian denomination that declares such bold doctrines as to suggest that God is capable of certain behaviors that would result in His immediate cessation of being God. That there are principles superordinate to the Supreme Being. In order for God to be God, He must be a God of justice, and perfectly so. If He is merely an arbitrary Being whose commands are rooted in whim, not reason, then obedience to Him is purposeless. But because He has a purpose, and it has been revealed, all of His laws have a design serving that purpose: our happiness. Purpose, design, and justice are all inherent principles of our creation.

And so is judgment day.

The principle of accountability for our choices in this mortal life is as immutable as God's just character. No matter how small, no matter how justified we think we are, no matter our weakness or the other guy's bad character, we will all have no excuse one day. No excuse, but perhaps a covering. If we repent, the Savior will take upon Himself our guilt no matter how excuse-free our guilt is. His merciful grace is our Good News.

Until then, however, mortality definitely still is a space where sin is tolerated--only temporarily, of course, but this fallen world with sin and sin's consequences in it is part of what makes the space a worthy test.

God doesn't allow sin, we do. And His promise and design is that this temporary allowance teach us in the here and now what is and what is not tolerable. Until it stops, and we are left either covered or convicted.

2. God has a will, and the more we surrender ours to His, the better we grow and benefit. He directs individuals sometimes in very detailed ways. But when it comes to public pronouncements of His will, He chooses authorized voices--prophets--and gives them commandments. Being under commandment and failing to obey is sin. Knowing the commandment and choosing to disobey it is sin. Is one more condemnable for its active and rebellious nature and another less for its passive nature, and for the weak nature of those who fail to obey it? Maybe, but none of it will be excused, which is to say that all of it will prevent our celestial happiness.

But there are tons of choices we can make that don't fall under the obedience versus disobedience to God rubric, and yet can have serious consequences for us. These are mistakes. These aren't what God is judging, so we shouldn't either. God looks upon weakness differently than He looks upon rebellion. And He looks upon mistakes differently than sins.